Halftime: Hofstra vs. Towson
Michael Phillips
Mar 07, 2008
Halftime at the Richmond Coliseum, with Towson leading Hofstra 31-13.
Time to look at how these teams are representing themselves in that other important category: mascots.

“Doc” the Towson Tiger:
Pros:
-Doc manages to appear both menacing and approachable at the same time.
-The wrestling team was formerly nicknamed the Teachers, which we can all agree is a very non-menacing name.
Cons:
- Doc is very short. If he went to a theme park, he might have trouble getting on the roller coasters.
-The former mascot was a Knight. They probably would’ve been better off without making the switch.
-Doc carries around a pom-pom, which makes him 14 percent less tough.

“Willie and Kate Pride,“ the Hofstra Lions:
Pros:
-Two is better than one. And both are normal height.
-Double-teaming ability would be useful in a CAA mascot showdown.
-Small novelty crown looks regal without being pretentious.
Cons:
-Some fans (and bloggers) may find it difficult to distinguish Willie from Kate.
-Male lions let the females do the hunting, which may lend itself better to the women’s basketball team.
So as you can see, the edge goes to the Pride. They don’t have that advantage on the court right now. We’ll see if Willie and Kate suit up in the second half.
Next entry: Second half: Hofstra vs. Towson
Previous entry: First half: Hofstra vs. Towson
Back to the Home Page »

Are the lions conjoined?
Also, at the Wichita Zoo, which must be run by women. There’s a ton of misandry about the females of certain species who do all the work. Like the lions. They even have kiosks where you insert a key and they sing jingles, like, “La la la in an elelphant herd, it’s woman who does all the work, word.“
I hate that. And no, I am not a Misogynist.
Kellen of Wichita, Ks
Mar. 7, 2008 at 02:15 PM
Yeah, but neither of these mascots compare to mythical birds or collections of wheat.
Steve Langley of Mascot City, USA
Mar. 7, 2008 at 02:15 PM
Post a comment