<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>The Board Room Blog on inRich.com</title>
   <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/index/</link>
    <description>A blog by the Editorial Staff at the Richmond Times-Dispatch</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>bhinkle@timesdispatch.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:59:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://{current_domain}/" />
    




    <item>
      <title>Just Say No</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/just_say_no/</link>
      <description>Can Republicans oppose the president&#8217;s health&#45;care agenda without offering an alternative proposal of their own? To watch a videotorial on the subject, click here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:59:59 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Plug the Holes</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/plug_the_holes/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hackers have broken into America&#8217;s power grid. To watch a videotorial on the subject, click <a href="http://static.mgnetwork.com/rtd/slideshows/opinion/20090410util/index.html" title="here" target="blank">here</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:54:07 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Don&#8217;t Worry, Be Happy</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/dont_worry_be_happy/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the recent activity of various state legislatures, all the world&#8217;s big problems have been solved. See <a href="http://static.mgnetwork.com/rtd/slideshows/opinion/20090324happ/index.html" title="today's slideshow" target="blank">today&#8217;s slideshow</a> for an explanation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:14:57 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Bring &#8216;Em On</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/bring_em_on/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the big deal about moving enemy combatants from Guantanamo to the continental U.S.? There&#8217;s nothing to fear, says <a href="http://static.mgnetwork.com/rtd/slideshows/opinion/20090317guant/index.html" title="this videotorial" target="blank">this videotorial</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:45:52 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Alien Jackpot</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/alien_jackpot/</link>
      <description>Our latest videotorial discusses an Arizona rancher who had to pay $78,000 for the &#8220;crime&#8221; of stopping four illegal aliens who were trespassing on his property. Watch it here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:37:59 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Idiocy</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/idiocy/</link>
      <description>This week we&#8217;re combining the videotorial format with a &#8220;Two Richmond Idiots&#8221; podcast featuring Deputy Editorial Page Editor Bart Hinkle, Commentary Editor Bob Rayner, and Cordel Faulk of the UVA Center for Politics. You can catch it by clicking here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:25:38 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The Unfairness Doctrine</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_unfairness_doctrine/</link>
      <description>For a videotorial on talk about resurrecting the Fairness Doctrine, click here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:33:05 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Turtle Power</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/turtle_power/</link>
      <description>For a slideshow editorial about the effort to make the Eastern Box Turtle the official reptile of the Commonwealth, click here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:22:11 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Gimme</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/gimme/</link>
      <description>For a videotorial on the Richmond City Council&#8217;s proposed ban on curbside panhandling, click here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:48:52 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Keep Coughing, Please</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/keep_coughing_please/</link>
      <description>Here is a little slideshow editorial about proposals before the General Assembly to raise the cigarette tax.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:16:12 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Parallels</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/parallels/</link>
      <description>For a slideshow editorial on the recent trouble between Israel and Gaza, click here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a slideshow editorial on the recent trouble between Israel and Gaza, <a href="http://static.mgnetwork.com/rtd/slideshows/opinion/20090127hate/index.html" title="click here" target="blank">click here</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:13:56 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>About That &#8216;Loophole&#8217;</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/about_that_loophole/</link>
      <description>We&#8217;ve put together a little slideshow on the gun&#45;show loophole being debated at the General Assembly. Click here to view it.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve put together a little slideshow on the gun-show loophole being debated at the General Assembly. <a href="http://static.mgnetwork.com/rtd/slideshows/opinion/20090127guns/index.html" title="click here" target="blank">Click here</a> to view it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:39:19 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Socialism in the USA</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/socialism_in_the_usa/</link>
      <description>What is socialism?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When campaign critics likened Barack Obama&#8217;s economic policies to &#8220;socialism,&#8220; did they know what they were talking about? One doubts. They seemed to base their accusations on Obama&#8217;s comment regarding &#8220;spreading&#8221; around wealth. While income redistribution might be essential to socialism, redistribution does not necessarily translate into socialism. Does not true socialism require public ownership of the means of production? Another question. Although socialists Eugene Debs and (especially) Norman Thomas were significant public figures, socialism never prospered in the U.S. as it did in Europe. Why? The children want to know. And, finally (thank Heaven), what does the Bible have to say about all this. The RT-D&#8217;s readers are split on this. It says here that the Bible offers evidence to support almost all political arguments but in the end translates neither into a Democratic platform nor into a Republican one. We also say that the lyrics of the magnificant (Mary&#8217;s song) convey sentiments not historically associated with the right (although so-called conservative populists might take the verses as a call to cultural arms).&nbsp; </p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:33:30 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>GOP Rout</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/gop_rout/</link>
      <description>Virginia Republicans suffered a horrible year.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A correspondent makes the case that Virginia was the GOP&#8217;s worst state on Nov. 4. Republicans lost three House seats in the Old Dominion, plus a Senate seat. And Democrats carried the Commonwealth at the presidential level for the first time since 1964. This space will not now throw out any explanations, or offer any answers, but would like to ask, what happened, and what must the GOP do? </p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:08:39 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Why Endorse?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/why_endorse/</link>
      <description>Judging from the mail, some readers might have missed last Sunday&#8217;s editorial explaining our endorsement process. For those who are curious, here it is again.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:55:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Sound and Fury</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/sound_and_fury/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://media.gatewayva.com/multimedia/podcasts/idiots_podcast_nov_12.mp3" title="Two Richmond Idiots podcast is up" target="blank">Two Richmond Idiots podcast is up</a>. Topics: Dwight Jones, Obama and Machiavelli, Secret Service code names, and much more.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:02:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Join the Discussion</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/join_the_discussion/</link>
      <description>This coming Tuesday The Times&#45;Dispatch will host a Public Square discussion on the tough economic times. 

A panel discussion will get the ball rolling. The panelists: T. Gaylon Layfield III, president and CEO of Xenith bank; Keith L. Muth, managing partner of Virginia Asset Management; J. Afred Broaddus Jr., former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond; and Laura Lafayette, senor VP with the Richmond Association of Realtors. 

Audience questions will follow the panel discussion.

Come to the newspaper&#8217;s offices at 300 East Franklin Street downtown, or watch the live broadcast on inRich.com. 

If you have questions, call Robin Beres at 649&#45;6305.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:42:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Chesterfiled as Bellwether</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/chesterfiled_as_bellwether/</link>
      <description>Is Chesterfield the key to national elections.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Barack Obama enjoyed steady leads in the polls, Election Day arrived with the outcome in doubt. Would the so-called Bradley (or Wilder) Effect mean an upset for John McCain? Virginia&#8217;s polls closed at 7. By 7:20 Chesterfield&#8217;s returns were suggesting trends. McCain led the GOP stronghold but with only about 54 percent. If a Republican wins Chesterfield with 54, he cannot win Virginia, and if he cannot win Virginia, he cannot win the nation. Our advice for calling next year&#8217;s gubernatorial election is to access the Chesterfield&#8217;s registrar&#8217;s Web site (the region&#8217;s best), check out the GOP percentage and amaze your friends and fellow windbags at the bar with your knowledge of Virginia politics. </p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:02:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Knits and Tweeds</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/knits_and_tweeds/</link>
      <description>Do clothes make the man?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend yound our humble servant (i.e., someone who clearly thinks very highly of himself) in Philadelphia. He walked passed a clothing store whose window displays featured tweeds. Tis the season. And he was dressed suitably: Tweed jacket (with a torn lining), and knit tie. As he waited for a table at a newly opened but already trendy cafe, the hostess exclaimed, &#8220;I love your tie.&#8220; &#8220;Me, too,&#8220; said another young lady, her arms cradling menus. The two said the tie showed tons of style, and we basked. We also explained it came from a New England shop that takes pride in refusing to change. The latest catalogue offers selections that could have been, and probably were, in the first. &#8220;That&#8217;s why you swing,&#8220; the hostesses said, and we are not making this up. For at least one day it was time to toast dweebs and geezers.&nbsp;  </p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:02:01 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The Palin Affect</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_palin_affect/</link>
      <description>Was Sarah Palin a plus or minus to the GOP?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Lilla, a professor at Columbia, opened a column in the Nov. 8-9 Weekend section of the Wall Street Journal with an arresting paragraph: &#8220;Finita la commedia. Many things ended on Tuesday evening when Barack Obama was elected 44th president of the United States, and depending on how you voted you are either celebrating or mourning this weekend. But no matter what our political affiliations, we should all - Republicans and Democrats alike - be toasting the return of Governor Sarah Palin to Juneau, Alaska.&#8220; Lilla takes provocation almost to the level of cruelty, but, as they say, intellectual combat ain&#8217;t beanbag. Conservatism&#8217;s transformation into an ideology of grievance, as exemplified by Palin&#8217;s nomination and by the serial rants of Hannity and Limbaugh, has many causes and likely consequences. The immediate question asks whether Palin helped the 2008 GOP ticket. Her selection immediately energized the so-called base. Yet as the campaign proceeded it appeared she hurt McCain&#8217;s chances among independents, where the election was to be lost or won. Another thing, although voting numbers went up, the election did not produce the expected surge in turnout. Some analysts suspect conservative Republicans stayed home, the better to nourish Lord knows how many resentments. Palin did not bring them back in, and may have pushed them out. Palin helped for a week or two, then hurt. If she and what she represents become a major player in the inevitable battle for the GOP soul, then the party is in for a rocky stretch, and probably a disenchanting one.&nbsp; </p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:38:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Turnout , or Turndown?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/turnout_or_turndown/</link>
      <description>Guessperts predicted a significant increase in voter turnout on Nov 4. The hard numbers did not add up.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2008 campaign was the most exciting in generations. Rallies drew huge crowds. The press daily reported surges in registration. Almost everyone expected records, not only in raw votes but in turnout rates. On the morning after the election, something funny happened. I looked at Barack Obama&#8217;s popular vote and it struck me as familiar. His total was about what George Bush had received four years before. During the next years days late counts pushed the vote higher, but it is now clear that 2008 did not produce the expected turnout bonanza. The numbers and percentages will go up but, apparently, only by a point or two. Some analysts, yours truly included, suspect many Republicans stayed home (or went fishing, to use the political cliche). The youth vote may have been overestimated as well. This was, after all, the third or fourth election in recent decades in which America&#8217;s young people were going to storm the ramparts.&nbsp;  And never discount hype. Our age overstates everything (as this statement itself suggests). For the final answer we will await wisdom greater than ours.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:07:01 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Good Move</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/good_move/</link>
      <description>President&#45;elect Obama&#8217;s selection of Rahm Emanuel as White House chief of staff  is encouraging. The Illinois congressman is someone who knows how Congress works, will make sure Obama doesn&#8217;t get rolled by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, and has a history of beating back the left wing of his party when it goes so far astray that it starts to scare voters. Of course he&#8217;s at least as ruthless and partisan as Karl Rove, but why mention that? Winning big entitles a president to a little partisanship.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:12:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Three Idiots</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/three_idiots1/</link>
      <description>The Two Idiots Podcast features a different lineup this week. Editorial Page Editor Todd Culbertson, a walking encyclopedia of election knowledge, joins Robin Beres and YHS here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:16:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The Conscience of Conservatism</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_conscience_of_conservatism/</link>
      <description>David Frum seems to be one of the few remaining grown&#45;ups in the conservative sandbox.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:30:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Dangerous Business</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/dangerous_business/</link>
      <description>Making predictions is a fool&#8217;s errand, but what the heck:

The stock market will go up no matter who wins. It&#8217;s primed for a recovery and an Obama win is already discounted. Who knows how long the rally will last. Several months, I bet. And the media will give Obama credit, even though he&#8217;s only president&#45;elect.
 
I think there&#8217;s a 30 percent chance Obama wins by 5&#45;10 percent with 330+ electoral votes
 
I think there&#8217;s a 45 percent chance he wins by 0&#45;5 percent, with 275&#45;330 electoral votes
 
And there&#8217;s a 20 percent chance that McCain pulls a stunning upset and wins by about 1 percent of the popular vote and with 274 to 281 electoral votes.
 
There&#8217;s a 5 percent chance McCain loses the popular vote narrowly but wins the Electoral College. Imagine what fun that would be.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:51:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Let&#8217;s Hear it for Multiculturalism!</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/lets_hear_it_for_multiculturalism/</link>
      <description>A 13&#45;year&#45;old girl is stoned to death in front of a crowd:

Dozens of men stoned Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow to death Monday in a stadium packed with 1,000 spectators in the southern port city of Kismaayo, Amnesty International and Somali news media reported, citing witnesses. The Islamist militia in charge of Kismaayo had accused her of adultery after she reported that three men had raped her, the rights group said. 

Some values&#8212;and by &#8220;some&#8221; I mean &#8220;those of the Enlightenment&#8221;&#8212;are worth defending and, dismayingly, still need it.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:01:01 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The Latest Idiocy</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_latest_idiocy/</link>
      <description>The latest &#8220;Two Richmond Idiots&#8221; podcast installment is here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Wonkery</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/wonkery/</link>
      <description>If you&#8217;re tired of the campaign season&#8217;s partisan bickering and want to sink your teeth into some good ol&#8217;&#45;fashioned public policy analysis (and, gee whiz, who doesn&#8217;t enjoy that??!!), you might check out eduwonk.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:05:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Obama&#8217;s Early Days</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/obamas_early_days/</link>
      <description>What&#8217;s interesting about these bits is not so much Obama&#8217;s gravitation toward Marxist profs and structural feminists, but the calculation behind the gravitation. Received wisdom holds that college is supposed to be a time of intellectual exploration and discovery, a period when students are supposed to mix with people whose perspectives are sharply different from their own (that&#8217;s the whole idea behind diversity, isn&#8217;t it?). 

Yet Obama embraced the reigning orthodoxy of campus leftism, going so far as to pick his friends on the basis of their politics. Wouldn&#8217;t it have been far more audacious to seek out friends regardless of their politics&#8212;or at least to look for some among, say, conservative Christians, advocates of gun rights, and proponents of free enterprise? Assuming, of course, there were any to be found?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Early Returns</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/early_returns/</link>
      <description>It looks as though Dixville Notch might lose its time&#45;honored place as the first in the country to report its election returns, if statistics compiled by GMU professor Michael McDonald are any indication.

He notes:

Already, well over ten million people have cast their ballot for this November&#8217;s much&#45;anticipated presidential election. This statistic is from just a few states and localities where these early voting numbers are available. In Georgia, for instance, more people have already voted early than voted early in all of the last presidential election.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Your Civic Duty to Stand in Long Lines</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/your_civic_duty_to_stand_in_long_lines/</link>
      <description>According to Marc Fisher, early voting is deleterious to democracy because . . . well, if you read carefully, it&#8217;s dangerous because it gives an advantage to voters who actually read and think:

More disturbing, early voters tend to be &#8220;older, better educated and more cognitively engaged in the campaign and in politics,&#8220; Gronke says. 

Heaven knows we don&#8217;t want to encourage that!</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>For Your Listening Pleasure</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/for_your_listening_pleasure/</link>
      <description>The newspaper&#8217;s website now has a dedicated podcast page.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:21:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Obama Bears</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/obama_bears/</link>
      <description>The stock market is clearly reacting to ailing credit markets and the prospect of a global recession.

But might investors also be discounting an Obama victory and the slow&#45;growth, big&#45;government policies that portends?

The gleeful left and its media cronies won&#8217;t want to abandon their shallow analysis of the current troubles &#8212; because simple&#45;minded explanations play to their advantage. Still, once they&#8217;re in charge, the Democrats may want to take a more responsible approach. An ailing economy &#8212; and stoking jaundiced public perceptions about the economy &#8212; will no longer play to their advantage.

It might be a hard habit to break after eight years.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:23:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The Senate Candidates Respond</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_senate_candidates_respond/</link>
      <description>. . . to the newspaper&#8217;s questions on the issues.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>More Idiocy</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/more_idiocy1/</link>
      <description>&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Topics for today&#8217;s <a href="http://wmaudio.mgnetwork.com/audio/rtd/two_idiots_october_16.mp3" title="Two Richmond Idiots podcast" target="blank">Two Richmond Idiots</a> podcast: the presidential debate, the electoral map, the Bradley effect, Obama&#8217;s tax plan, Gilmore/Warner, single-sex classes, suing God, and Doug Wilder and the mayor&#8217;s race. </p>

<p>And some whatnot.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Gilmore v. Warner</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/gilmore_v_warner/</link>
      <description>The presidential race has overshadowed other contests, which is too bad. Virginia&#8217;s Senate race is an important one. This Sunday the Commentary section will provide a lengthy question&#45;and&#45;answer feature with Mark Warner and Jim Gilmore on a host of national and international issues with which the winner will have to contend, and about which neither has said a great deal elsewhere.

Don&#8217;t miss it.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:38:01 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Today&#8217;s Eye&#45;Opener</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/todays_eye_opener/</link>
      <description>This handy chart breaks down regulatory spending changes by administration. It&#8217;s gone down only once since Johnson. Guess who.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:20:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Idionomics</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/idionomics/</link>
      <description>The &#8220;Two Richmond Idiots&#8221; podcast available here was recorded last week, but got hung up in, ah, post&#45;production. But the timeless wisdom is still timeless!</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>To the Rescue</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/to_the_rescue/</link>
      <description>Thank God we finally have somebody who knows how to make the American economy really hum weighing in on the situation:

BRUSSELS (Reuters) &#45; Former President Jimmy Carter said on Friday the &#8220;atrocious economic policies&#8221; of the Bush administration had caused the worst global financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Maybe he can fix the Iranian problem, too.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Sunny Side Up</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/sunny_side_up/</link>
      <description>An economist channels Bobby McFerrin&#8212; Don&#8217;t Worry, Be Happy:

The economy outside the financial sector is healthier than it seems. 

. . .

Since World War II, the marginal product of capital, after taxes, has averaged 7 percent to 8 percent per year. (In other words, each dollar of capital invested in the economy earns, on average, 7 cents to 8 cents annually.) And what happened during 2007 and the first half of 2008, when the financial markets were already spooked by oil price spikes and housing price crashes? The marginal product was more than 10 percent per year, far above the historical average. The third&#45;quarter earnings reports from some companies already suggest that America&#8217;s non&#45;financial companies are still making plenty of money.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Small Comfort</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/small_comfort/</link>
      <description>Holman Jenkins, the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s clever contrarian columnist, offers a single ray of sunshine for Republicans anticipating a landslide defeat for their party in less than four weeks &#8212; before extinguishing the sun altogether:

Yet the cool deliberation with which Mr. Obama says whatever will get him where he&#8217;s going &#8212; last night it was the accusation &#8220;deregulation&#8221; repeated over and over &#8212;is reassuring in its own way. Where&#8217;s the evidence that he would be the least bit bound by anything he said during the campaign &#8212; on taxes, regulation, health care or anything else? His dispassion in hitting his talking points is the dispassion of the truly noncommittal.

He wants to win and he wants to be reelected. Plus, he will have been elected without the help of Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Congress &#8212; or, rather, despite them (Congress has a 9% favorable rating). Presumably he won&#8217;t feel obligated to deliver their wish list. He wants Bill Clinton&#8217;s presidency (he&#8217;s already got Bill Clinton&#8217;s economic advisers) without the intern baggage or other compulsive aspects.

Now Mr. McCain &#8212; he&#8217;s the one you might have to worry about. A one&#45;term president, he might actually have some weird agenda that &#8220;honor&#8221; compels him to pursue. At least, that&#8217;s the best argument we can think of for President Obama&#8212;admittedly not much to weigh against the Halloween horror of one&#45;party Democratic rule at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Friday Idiocy</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/friday_idiocy/</link>
      <description>The latest &#8220;Two Richmond Idiots&#8221; podcast is here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:18:01 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Zowie</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/zowie/</link>
      <description>Warner is up by 26 in the latest.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Palin&#8217;s Flair</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/palins_flair/</link>
      <description>Meghan O&#8217;Rourke makes an astute observation about Sarah Palin that cuts a little close to the bone:

[S]he&#8217;s borrowed and inhabited the language of cute&#45;can&#45;do&#45;ism that&#8217;s exploited by companies to lull workers into taking pleasure in how much of their time is given over to &#8220;breakout sessions&#8221; and the business of being an employee. 

Bingo. She does come across much like a mid&#45;level salesperson trying to sell you on a new insurance package that she really does seem kind of enthusiastic about. If life is like high school with money, then Palin is like the pep&#45;squad leader who&#8217;s always trying to get people to join in the pre&#45;game rally. 

For the English&#45;lit kids who prefer to wear black and scoff at enthusiasm, it comes off as mildly ridiculous and unsophisticated. But then their own attempts at sophistication can look mildly ridiculous, too. (Let&#8217;s face it: Nearly anyone who falls short of absolute sainthood comes across as mildly ridiculous from time to time. It&#8217;s called being human.)

The English&#45;lit kids who preferred to wear black are now writing for newspapers and TV and the Internet, and they have been scoffing. Thing is, there are an awful lot of people who really enjoy pep rallies, enthusiasm, cute can&#45;do&#45;ism, and breakout sessions at work. Maybe not enough to swing an election&#8212;but maybe so.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>What&#8217;s So Great About Small Towns?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/whats_so_great_about_small_towns/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama&#8217;s &#8220;cling to&#8221; comments might have been woefully off-base. But so is the portrait of small-town America as some bucolic idyll, says <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/129184.html" title="Steve Chapman" target="blank">Steve Chapman</a>:</p>

<p><b></p><blockquote><p>Most Americans, it seems, can tolerate hearing of the superiority of the small town, as long as they don&#8217;t have to live in one. You wouldn&#8217;t know it from listening to country music stations, or to the governor of Alaska, but four out of every five Americans choose not to reside in rural areas.</p>

<p>Maybe if they ventured beyond the city limits more often, those people would not be so inclined to believe everything they hear about the merits of rustic hamlets, which harbor a full complement of social ills. . . .</p></blockquote><p></b></p>

<p>And he&#8217;s got the stats to prove it!</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Capital Idea?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/capital_idea/</link>
      <description>In The New Dare to Discipline, his book on child&#45;rearing, James Dobson (yes, that James Dobson&#8212;read the book before you judge it by its author) discusses how children respond to positive reinforcement and incentives. Paying them to do extra chores teaches them the value of work and the virtues of spending wisely. It is also important, he contends, to give positive reinforcement sooner rather than later. There is little benefit in telling a small child that if he cleans up his room today you will take him to the pool next summer. Reward promptly.

The D.C. school system seems to be taking that lesson to heart with its new Capital Gains program offering financial incentives for academic performance. And it seems to be working:

Students have been buzzing about the pilot program, called Capital Gains, since they learned in late August that their school had been selected. The school now includes students from Shaw, which closed in June. 

Some have already identified the weaknesses they&#8217;ll need to correct in order to cash in. Jai Carson, 13, said he&#8217;ll need to focus more on his eighth&#45;grade history class. Dominique Watson, also 13 and an eighth&#45;grader, said she&#8217;ll have to cut down on the classroom banter. 

&#8220;Personally, for me, I like to talk a lot,&#8220; she said. &#8220;So I&#8217;ll have to kind of tone that down.&#8220; 

Capital Gains is the creation of Roland G. Fryer Jr., a Harvard University economist and principal investigator for the university&#8217;s American Inequality Lab, which studies issues of poverty and race. Fryer is searching for ways to close the academic achievement gap that separates white and minority children. . . .

Telling kids that studying now might help them earn a promotion three decades from now seems rather abstract. Telling them they can earn $100 in a couple of weeks makes the moral immediate.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Local Talent</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/local_talent/</link>
      <description>Every passing day adds to the evidence that John McCain should have gone South for his running mate &#8212; and chosen Rep. Eric Cantor, a Richmond real&#45;estate lawyer who has the expertise and the political savvy to help keep Republicans competitive in a race that&#8217;s looking very tough to win right now. Cantor has been the one star on Capitol Hill in the past week, and his  critique of Speaker Pelosi&#8217;s performance so far warmed the hearts of the reasonable and compassionate all across this still great land of ours.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:10:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>War in Lebanon</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/war_in_lebanon/</link>
      <description>The New Yorker parachutes into Virginia for some observations about Obama&#8217;s chances in Appalachia:

After Obama&#8217;s appearance, I left Lebanon and drove into the Shenandoah Valley, to Roanoke, for a visit with a man who has made a profession of selling Democrats to rural Virginians. David (Mudcat) Saunders has been called the Democrats&#8217; &#8220;Bubba coordinator,&#8221; the embodiment of the Party&#8217;s faint but growing recognition that its alienation of rural white men is both unnecessary and costly. Saunders, who is fifty&#45;nine, is an exaggerated version of an &#233;litist liberal&#8217;s caricature of a Southern redneck. His face fixed in a wicked grin, he happily proclaims his love for Jesus and guns, college football and bluegrass music, and the Democratic Party. He smokes Camels, and is prolifically profane. Saunders is a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, and can provide details of his great&#45;grandfather&#8217;s wounding at the Battle of Seven Pines, in Henrico County, while serving in General James L. Kemper&#8217;s brigade. He sleeps under a Rebel&#45;flag quilt, and when challenged on such matters he has invited his inquisitors to &#8220;kiss my Rebel ass&#8221;&#8212;his way of making the point that when Democrats are drawn into culture battles by prissy liberal sensitivities they usually lose the larger war.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:28:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The Crash</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_crash/</link>
      <description>Thank heaven for newspapers&#8212;&#45; and CNBC. As the nation struggles to survive and understand a financial crisis of mind&#45;numbing complexity, much of the broadcast media have decided that informing its audience is less important than engaging in an orgy of blame and attacks against Republicans specifically and free&#45;market capitalism in general. Count NPR, CNN, and MSNBC among the worst offenders, to no one&#8217;s real surprise.

The biggest crash so far may be in the national media&#8217;s credibility. When we look back at the extraordinary events of 2008, one of the saddest might be the death of objectivity in the national broadcast media. The patient has been on life&#45;support for years. This election campaign and economic crisis have killed it forever. I&#8217;m not going to give you any links to the offenders&#8217; site. No need to promote this kind of unprofessional hackery.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:57:01 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Thank Heaven for Small Favors</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/thank_heaven_for_small_favors/</link>
      <description>Foreclosures won&#8217;t necessarily drag down the value of your home.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>More Idiocy</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/more_idiocy/</link>
      <description>The latest &#8220;Two Richmond Idiots,&#8220; starring Cordel Faulk and your humble s., is available here. (The audio is corrupted for about a minute, starting 1:18 into the file. Bear with us!)

P.S.&#8212; If you mouse over the double arrow in the lower right&#45;hand corner of the player, you can play the audio back at 140 percent and 200 percent of normal playback time. Saves time AND sounds more like a cartoon. . . .</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The Three M&#8217;s</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_three_ms/</link>
      <description>In order: Muslims, Mormons, and Moosekillers.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Virginia: The New Dixville Notch?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/virginia_the_new_dixville_notch/</link>
      <description>Voting in the presidential contest starts today.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Failing Grades</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/failing_grades/</link>
      <description>Stuart Taylor, a middle&#45;of&#45;the&#45;road columnist for National Journal, gives  low marks to Obama, McCain, and the media when it comes to being truthful so far in the presidential campaign:

 ... many in the media have been one&#45;sided, sometimes adding to Obama&#8217;s distortions rather than acting as impartial reporters of fact and referees of the mud fights.

We still have many great journalists, but I no longer trust the major newspapers or television networks to provide consistently accurate and fair reporting and analysis of all the charges and countercharges. This in an era when the noise produced by highly partisan TV hosts and blogs creates a crying need for at least one newspaper that we can count on to play it straight.

Indeed, one reason that candidates get away with dishonest campaign ads and speeches may be that it is so hard for undecided voters like me to discern which charges are true, which are exaggerated, and which are false. Most people can&#8217;t spend hours every day cross&#45;checking diverse sources of information to verify the accuracy of slanted stories and broadcasts such as these:



Read Taylor&#8217;s column for examples of some of the most worst reporting, much of it devoted to trashing Sarah Palin.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:29:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>A Hack Job</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/a_hack_job/</link>
      <description>Today&#8217;s protip: When running for Vice President, don&#8217;t use an easily hacked e&#45;mail service. Try Blackberry!</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Cue Up the Al Gore Comparisons</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/cue_up_the_al_gore_comparisons/</link>
      <description>An aide for John McCain says the senator invented the Blackberry (or at least make it possible, but why quibble over details? Republicans didn&#8217;t quibble over the details of Al Gore&#8217;s Internet claim). 

Another McCain aide tried to put out the fire by saying, &#8220;&quot;This was obviously a boneheaded joke by a staffer.&#8216;&#8217;

Obviously boneheaded, certainly. . . .</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:33:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Three Idiots</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/three_idiots/</link>
      <description>Chief idiot Bart Hinkle is feeling poorly, so alternate idiots Robin Beres and Bob Rayner, join regular idiot Cordel Faulk in our weekly podcast, which treats you to drollery and insight about teen drinking, Sarah Palin, the great President George W. Bush (infer no irony), elitists, pig lips, and much much more.

Here &#8216;tis:

 click away</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:33:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Thank You, Mr. President</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/thank_you_mr_president/</link>
      <description>On Sept. 11, 2008, all Americans should take pause from their healthy partisan squabbling to thank President George W. Bush and his administration for their heroic and successful efforts to protect the country from terrorist attacks for seven years.

It&#8217;s no accident that we have not been hit again. History will remember Bush&#8217;s defense of the homeland as a prolonged act of extraordinary political courage  &#8212;&#45;&amp;nbsp;  and as the first great achievement of an American president in the 21st century.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:43:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Leading Questions</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/leading_questions/</link>
      <description>Yesterday NPR host Robert Siegel put a question to Robert Gibbs, communications director for the Obama camp, quoting liberal Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen to the effect that the Democrat wasn&#8217;t hitting back hard enough.

When&#8217;s the last time you heard an establishment media outlet ask why the Republican candidate wasn&#8217;t hitting back hard enough?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Kaus Strikes Again</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/kaus_strikes_again/</link>
      <description>Mickey Kaus does a quick compare&#45;and&#45;contrast on John Edwards and Kim Jong Il&#8230;.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b></p><blockquote><p>The most respectable, cautious members of the MSM&#8212;like National Public Radio&#8212;have no problem sifting and assessing scandalous, unverified rumors when it comes to ... Kim Jong Il. ... He&#8217;s had a stroke, he uses a look-alike stand in, he collapsed at an event, one report has a high &#8220;level of confidence&#8221; level, others don&#8217;t, &#8220;a couple of people&#8221; say another report is &#8220;solid.&#8220; ... Why is doing the same thing for presidential candidates irresponsible and tabloidy?</p></blockquote><p></b></p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:53:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>More Idiocracy</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/more_idiocracy/</link>
      <description>The latest &#8220;Two Richmond Idiots&#8221; podcast is available here. Topics: Sarah Palin&#8217;s daughter&#8217;s pregnancy, Doug Wilder vs. the city auditor, stupid campaign rhetoric, Dan Quayle (and throwing up in the street), and Cordel demands tax hikes immediately. (He&#8217;s a state employee now, so. . . .) Plus the usual bunch of other idiotic stuff.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Clarence Thomas Redux</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/clarence_thomas_redux/</link>
      <description>Sarah Palin may want to review the treatment Justice Clarence Thomas received after he was nominated to the Supreme Court. She seems certain to be forced through the same slimy gauntlet.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin may want to review the treatment Justice Clarence Thomas received after he was nominated to the Supreme Court. She seems certain to be forced through the same slimy gauntlet.</p>

<p>We&#8217;ve already endured a weekend with a Democratic congresswoman bopping around the cable channels talking about <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/miami-dade/breaking-news/story/664171.html">Palin&#8217;s body parts</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><b>&#8216;'Women don&#8217;t want a candidate on the ballot just because of the parts that she has,&#8216;&#8217; Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz said on MSNBC, portraying Palin as someone who opposes everything from equal rights for women to improving healthcare for kids.</p>

<p>&#8216;'If John McCain thinks he can substitute Sarah Palin for Hillary Clinton in the minds of Hillary Clinton supporters,&#8216;&#8217; she said, ``he&#8217;s sadly mistaken.&#8216;&#8217;</b>
</p></blockquote>

<p>Now Palin has earned the Internet&#8217;s ultimate acknowledgement of national celebrity for a woman: claims about the discovery of nude pictures: <a href="http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14750293">Sarah Palin&#8217;s nude pic sends web into meltdown</a>.</p>

<p>Turns out the photo in question may be an old shot of actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus. This being a family blog, we&#8217;ll let you find that one yourself.</p>

<p>This is getting really ugly, which means Gov. Palin must be scaring the pants off some Democrats and their media minions.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:27:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>What Does &#8220;Finite Supply&#8221; Mean?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/what_does_finite_supply_mean/</link>
      <description>In the case of oil, it depends on whom you ask.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of oil, it depends on whom you ask. If you ask an economist, for instance, you get <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=760789&amp;p=1" title="this intriguing answer" target="blank">this intriguing answer</a>:</p>

<p><b></p><blockquote><p>But &#8220;running out of oil&#8221; is not as much a question of physics as it is one of economics. And economics assures us that we will never run out of oil.</p></blockquote><p></b></p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:52:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>A New Idiots Podcast</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/a_new_idiots_podcast/</link>
      <description>Cordel and I taped a podcast on Friday about the Democratic convention and Sarah Palin (and the world&#8217;s greatest nicknames), but the exigencies of the day prevented posting it until now. You can listen to it in all its raw, unedited glory here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cordel and I taped a podcast on Friday about the Democratic convention and Sarah Palin (and the world&#8217;s greatest nicknames), but the exigencies of the day prevented posting it until now. You can listen to it in all its raw, unedited glory <a href="http://wmaudio.mgnetwork.com/audio/rtd/two_richmond_idiots_august29.mp3" title="here" target="here">here</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:21:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Some Background on Palin</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/some_background_on_palin/</link>
      <description>Since, you know, she&#8217;s not exactly a household name&#8230;.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since, you know, she&#8217;s not exactly a household name&#8230;.</p>

<p><a href="http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/story/8334949p-8231037c.html" title="RISING STAR: Wasilla mayor was groomed from an early political age" target="blank">RISING STAR: Wasilla mayor was groomed from an early political age</a></p>

<p><a href="http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8337406p-8233470c.html" title="Part 2: Rebel status has fueled front-runner's success" target="blank">Part 2: Rebel status has fueled front-runner&#8217;s success</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:56:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>A Conversation</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/a_conversation/</link>
      <description>Our Op/Ed Page editor, Cindy Paris, recently exchanged thoughts about the Democratic Convention with her daughter, Lindsey. Here&#8217;s the discussion.</description>
      <dc:subject>Domestic</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Op/Ed Page editor, Cindy Paris, recently exchanged thoughts about the Democratic Convention with her daughter, Lindsey. Here&#8217;s the discussion:</p>

<p><br />
<b></p><blockquote>

<p><br />
Lindsey,<br />
We&#8217;re in Day 4 of the Democratic Convention now, anticipating Obama&#8217;s acceptance speech at Mile High tonight. I know you were a very strong Hillary Clinton supporter during the primaries. What do you think, how do you feel about what&#8217;s happening in Denver with the Democrats?</p>

<p><br />
Mom,<br />
&nbsp; I still consider myself a strong Hillary Clinton supporter, and the reason I supported her was because I thought she could deliver on the promise of restoring the security and economic stability of the United States; redeem America&#8217;s image around the world; help bring the war in Iraq to a successful end, allowing our troops to come home with Iraq safely in the hands of its own people; create millions of new jobs; give all Americans health care; and ensure a much brighter future.&nbsp; These are exactly the promises Barack Obama has campaigned on with such eloquence and inspiration, and each day I become more confident that he can and will deliver.&nbsp; The Democratic leadership stands with Barack Obama now, and millions of Americans are joining the effort to take back the country.&nbsp; I&#8217;m very excited about the upcoming election.</p>

<p>Lindsey,<br />
&nbsp;   I, too, think Obama can deliver&#8212;to the extent that the president can and must be the leader who sets the tone and direction for the country. This is Obama&#8217;s greatest strength&#8212;his audacity of hope, and the ability to speak it and inspire it in others. <br />
&nbsp;   Most of the talking heads are looking for more red meat: &#8220;When will the Democrats come out fighting about .....&#8220; well, you name it: the economy, Iraq, terror. So I&#8217;ve listened to the speeches with an ear toward substance, and have found it lacking, when compared with the amount of team-building that&#8217;s going on. However, the team-building has been absolutely necessary: for the different factions of the party to be on the same page, and, more important, to inspire the party itself to get back in the game. As Biden&#8217;s dad told him, &#8220;Champ, it&#8217;s not about getting knocked down; it&#8217;s about getting back up.&#8220; </p>

<p><br />
Mom, <br />
&nbsp;   Some of the talking heads will never be satisfied.&nbsp; For months after Hillary endorsed Obama in June, they still speculated skeptically about whether or not the party would be united by the convention.&nbsp; Now that it&#8217;s so obvious that Obama&#8217;s most enthusiastic supporters, those who traveled to Denver to see him accept the nomination for president, have so much respect for Bill and Hillary Clinton, and more importantly, now that it&#8217;s clear that Hillary and Bill are throwing their full support behind Barack Obama, the narrative as to whether or not the party is unified sounds ridiculous.&nbsp; This team-building, as you called it, has helped me and other Hillary supporters not only to support Obama, which most of us already did at least since June, but also to dedicate ourselves to investing in his candidacy.&nbsp; We&#8217;re fired up and ready to go.&nbsp; But that doesn&#8217;t make a good story.&nbsp; So the talking heads talk about what else the Dems should be doing.&nbsp; They could have stopped talking and listened&#8230; to Dennis Kucinich, for example, who gave an impassioned indictment of the Bush administration, or to John Kerry, who presented McCain as the ultimate flip-flopper.&nbsp; Both Clintons and Biden also illustrated the enormous contrast between Barack Obama and John McCain, and it&#8217;s so clear that Obama is the one who has the right direction in mind for our country.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p><br />
Lindsey,<br />
&nbsp;  &nbsp;  &nbsp; So now we&#8217;ve got the direction, AND the Democrats&#8217; boots on the ground, &#8220;fired up and ready to go.&#8220; There was direction in what Biden said, in what both Hillary and Bill Clinton said, and yes, in what John Kerry said&#8212;although I had to change the channel 3 times to hear what he was saying rather than the running commentary from each and every talking head in front of a TV camera.<br />
&nbsp;  &nbsp;  &nbsp; But before we leave the convention, I want to say a bit more about Michelle Obama&#8217;s speech Monday night. Here&#8217;s the piece that touched me:<br />
&nbsp;  &nbsp;   </p><blockquote><p> &#8220;I stand here today at the crosscurrents of that history, knowing that my piece of the American dream is a blessing hard won by those who came before me&#8230;. All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won&#8217;t do. That we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be. That is the thread that connects our hearts. That is the thread that runs through my journey and Barack&#8217;s journey and so many other improbable journeys that have brought us here tonight, where the current of history meets this new tide of hope.&#8220;</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;   &#8220;The thread that connects our hearts.&#8220; She spoke to the &#8220;people connection&#8221; I&#8217;ve been yearning for, the community that&#8217;s been missing&#8212;that at least I haven&#8217;t felt a part of &#8212;for the entire Bush presidency. There&#8217;s a difference between just seeing something done and knowing that you&#8217;re a part of it. Obama asks for my participation, my input, and shares the faith that the whole of America can be, should be&#8212;indeed, really is&#8212;already on the same page. I believe in that community, that piece of the American Dream.&nbsp;  </p>

<p><br />
Mom,<br />
&nbsp;   I was also moved by Michelle Obama&#8217;s speech on Monday, and I think you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head when you say that you believe in the community of possibility and hope, that piece of the American Dream.&nbsp; I&#8217;m sure tonight Barack Obama will inspire all of America to remember and live out that dream&#8230; on the 45th anniversary of Dr. King&#8217;s declaration of his dream of racial and social equity and harmony.&nbsp; We&#8217;ll probably get a little more &#8220;red meat&#8221; too, but overall, tonight will not be about the mistakes of the past but the promises of the future.<br />
&nbsp;   We stand at another crossroads of history, and we have a choice between further eroding our economy, squandering our national security, and isolating ourselves from the rest of the world through more unpopular, unnecessary war, or rebuilding our standing in the world and securing a bright future.&nbsp; After eight years of losing health care, jobs, and lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, of losing our dignity in the eyes of the world as we redefine torture and hold prisoners without trial, of forgetting the foundation of our Constitution, this election is not simply about a battle between Democrats and Republicans.&nbsp; This is about being on the right side of history, as Dr. King was, on the side of progress and peace and prosperity.&nbsp; The effectiveness of Barack Obama&#8217;s leadership depends upon the American people realizing that we each have a role to play in making America a more perfect union.&nbsp; It&#8217;s more than a dream, it&#8217;s a vision enshrined in our Constitution, it is our birthright, and Americans from all walks of life can unite with Barack Obama and make this vision a reality.<br />
&nbsp;  </p>

<p>Lindsey,<br />
&nbsp;   I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself!</p></blockquote><p></b><br />
 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:27:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The Most Liberal? Really?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_most_liberal_really/</link>
      <description>National Journal explains why it gave Barack Obama the equivalent of a ball player with the highest batting average.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>National Journal</b> <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/conventions/co_20080825_4458.php" title="explains why" target="blank">explains why</a> it gave Barack Obama the equivalent of a ball player with the highest batting average:</p>

<p><b></p><blockquote><p>The honor goes to the player with the highest batting average, regardless of whether he has the most hits. In Obama&#8217;s case, voting the liberal position 65 out of 66 times earned him the title, as opposed to a senator who might have voted the liberal position 80 times out of 90.</p></blockquote><p></b>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>This Was Pretty Much Inevitable</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/this_was_pretty_much_inevitable/</link>
      <description>Del. Sal Iaquinto made a clever and amusing campaign poster (above). Naturally, the Hypersensitive Brigades have taken offense:</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center></p><p><img src="http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/images/uploads/1571111.jpg" border="01" width="196" height="300" /></p><p></center></p>

<p>Del. Sal Iaquinto made a clever and amusing campaign poster (above). Naturally, the Hypersensitive Brigades have <a href="http://hamptonroads.com/2008/08/politicians-flier-offends-some-italian-roots" title="taken offense" target="blank">taken offense</a>:</p>

<p><b></p><blockquote><p>&#8220;I found it utterly offensive,&#8220; said Marra, an Italian-language professor at Old Dominion University. &#8220;It perpetuates the kind of stereotypes we&#8217;re accustomed to getting from Hollywood, not our elected officials, especially one that has Italian roots.&#8220;</p></blockquote><p></b></p>

<p>Not just mildly offensive, mind you. <b>Utterly</b> offensive.</p>

<p>Me? I find it offensive that a professor of language would say &#8220;one that&#8221; when referring to a person. It&#8217;s &#8220;one <b>who</b>,&#8220; perfesser.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:30:01 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Barticus Maximus and the Black Caesar</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/barticus_maximus_and_the_black_caesar/</link>
      <description>In the second installment of the &#8220;Two Richmond Idiots&#8221; podcast, your hosts discuss the Democratic convention, Mark Warner and Jim Gilmore, a statue for Doug Wilder, Hollywood&#8217;s portrayal of black people, and their favorite nicknames.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Shut Up, He Explained</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/shut_up_he_explained/</link>
      <description>If you can&#8217;t say anything nice, Barack Obama doesn&#8217;t want you to say anything at all.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:22:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>No News</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/no_news/</link>
      <description>According to the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Political Diary, Gov. Ed Rendell, D&#45;Pa., accused the media of coddling Barack Obama. He made the comments this weekend.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Political Diary, Gov. Ed Rendell, D-Pa., accused the media of coddling Barack Obama. He made the comments this weekend:</p>

<blockquote><p><b>It was an uncomfortable moment for the hosts of three network Sunday morning news shows.</p>

<p>Tom Brokaw of NBC News, Bob Schieffer of CBS News and George Stephanopoulos of ABC News had just finished a panel discussion at Denver&#8217;s Brown Palace Hotel during which they had concluded that the media&#8217;s coverage of the campaign so far had been largely fair. Then Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell took the podium to deliver &#8220;closing remarks.&#8220;</p>

<p>Mr. Rendell, a Hillary Clinton backer, came to bury the Big Three, not to praise them. He told the crowd of 300 political luminaries that the media&#8217;s coverage of the Democratic primaries had elevated personalities over substance and he complained of sexism in its treatment of Senator Clinton. He called the media&#8217;s kid-gloves handling of Barack Obama &#8220;absolutely embarrassing,&#8220; and suggested that the media had essentially given the presumptive Democratic nominee, whom he now supports, &#8220;a free pass.&#8220; Journalists, he said, had allowed themselves unprofessionally to be &#8220;caught up with emotion and excitement&#8221; in the historic nature of the Obama candidacy. He even called MSNBC &#8220;the official network of Obama&#8217;s campaign.&#8220;</p>

<p></b></p></blockquote>

<p>Wonder if Rendell will draw the same conclusions about the general election campaign coverage &#8212;&nbsp; except for the sexist part, of course?</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Geography Pre&#45;K</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/ok_virginians/</link>
      <description>Say it with me: Del ... mar ... va ...</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the naming gods called it the &#8220;Delmarva peninsula&#8221; is because the states that make up said land mass border each other in this order from north to south:</p>

<p>Del[aware]</p>

<p>Mar[yland]</p>

<p>and only then do we get to ...</p>

<p>V[irgini]a</p>

<p>It&#8217;s kind of a big &#8216;ol Maryland sandwich. (Is that on the SOL tests? If it&#8217;s not, it obviously needs to be.)</p>

<p>But, dear reader, don&#8217;t take anyone else&#8217;s word for it. Let your own eyes decide for you. Here&#8217;s a  <a href="http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/namerica/usstates/printpage/delmarva.htm" title="map." target="blank">map.</a></p>

<p>Why the uproar? </p>

<p>Everyone who was </p><p><u></p><p><i><b>not</b></i></p><p></u></p><p> on Fox News Sunday this past weekend and said Virginia borders Delaware raise your hands ... Not so fast <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV-mB3Wjuqs" title="Gov. Kaine." target="blank">Gov. Kaine.</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Two Richmond Idiots</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/two_richmond_idiots/</link>
      <description>My colleague, Cordel Faulk, and I, are dipping our toe into the podcasting waters. You can take in our first awkward, humble attempt here.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Oops</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/oops/</link>
      <description>One unavoidable truth about Barack Obama is emerging, though many pretend not to notice: Like George W. Bush, he&#8217;s not so impressive once the teleprompter is turned off. Who&#8217;d have guessed?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:05:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>If&#45;Publishers&#45;Start&#45;Censoring&#45;Their&#45;Own&#45;Books, The&#45;Terrorists&#45;Have&#45;Already&#45;Won Dept.</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/if_publishers_start_censoring_their_own_books_the_terrorists_have_already_w/</link>
      <description>Look who&#8217;s winning:

Life has been a roller coaster lately for Jones, 46, who went from being a Book&#45;of&#45;the&#45;Month Club pick to seeing her novel dropped by Random House, which said in a statement it had received &#8220;cautionary advice&#8221; that the fictionalized story of one of Muhammad&#8217;s wives might &#8220;incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment.&#8220; 

A Random House spokeswoman said she could not think of any other time the company had canceled a book because of such fears.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Put on Your Tinfoil Hats</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/put_on_your_tinfoil_hats/</link>
      <description>The right&#45;wing nutroots have been bruiting about some ridiculous fairy tales about Barack Obama (see, e.g., the memes about his secret Islamic faith, his fake birth certificate, and the Corsi jeremiad). But they&#8217;ve got some healthy competition on the left.

First there was the wild conspiracy theory that the Russia/Georgia war was ginned up to give John McCain an excuse to talk tough. Then there was the notion that because McCain performed well at his appearance at Saddleback Church, he must have cheated somehow. 

Now comes the assertion&#8212;rapidly debunked&#8212;that he cribbed a prisoner&#45;of&#45;war anecdote from Solzhenitsyn. You&#8217;d think that left&#45;wing netrootsers would eat a little crow at this point, right? Wrong. 

Somehow, the fact that they peddled a baseless assertion about McCain allegedly &#8220;skewers once and for all&#8220; a &#8220;cherished right&#45;wing falsehood.&#8220; Okay!</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Kaine Watch</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/kaine_watch/</link>
      <description>Virginia&#8217;s Governor is said to be among the top three possible Obama picks for veep:

Going into the final days, Mr. Obama was said to be focused mainly on three candidates: Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana, Gov. Tim Kaine of Virginia and Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware.

If he doesn&#8217;t get the nod, Kaine will be forgotten, at least in national memory&#8212;proof of how tough a sport politics can be. If he came in second or third at the Beijing Olympics, he&#8217;d be immortalized in the record books.

Then again, a nomination contest is more like a preliminary than a final event, isn&#8217;t it? Second&#45;place finishers in November will be immortalized in the record books&#8230;.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:50:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>The British Case</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/the_british_case/</link>
      <description>. . . for school choice. 

It&#8217;s funny because it&#8217;s true.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>State Spending Holiday</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/state_spending_holiday/</link>
      <description>It&#8217;s worth noting that while  state revenue growth has slowed drastically &#8212; Gov. Tim Kaine says increases in sales and income&#45;tax receipts are hovering around 1 percent &#8212; the commonwealth continues to collect more cash than it did a year ago.

The slowdown means that spending cannot reach the aspirational levels included in the budget. It does not mean the state will actually have to spend less than it did a year before. That&#8217;s small comfort for the agencies that will be receiving less money than expected, but it&#8217;s an important point to remember as the budget debate heats up &#8212; and one that spending advocates tend to ignore.

Families and businesses know how to react when income flattens out. They economize. The state will have to do the same.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>At Least He&#8217;s Not a Credible Mainstream Bigot</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/at_least_hes_not_a_credible_mainstream_bigot/</link>
      <description>The Obama Camp is pushing back against a new smearbook by Jerome Corsi, author of the anti&#45;Kerry smearbook Unfit for Command. Along with issuing a seemingly devastating 41&#45;page rebuttal, the Obama team is lambasting Corsi as &#8220;a discredited, fringe bigot.&#8220; 

They&#8217;ll get no argument here. But why the rhetorical overkill? Wouldn&#8217;t the word &#8220;bigot&#8221; have been enough? (Or maybe, &#8220;lying bigot&#8221;?) Presumably, anyone who is a bigot is on the fringe of American discourse (at least these days, thank goodness) and not creditable. Tactically, wouldn&#8217;t it have made more of an impact if the Obama camp had responded to spittle&#45;flecked calumny with cool disdain?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:50:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>A Neat Idea Spreads</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/a_neat_idea_spreads/</link>
      <description>We&#8217;ve written in the past about Zipcar, Flexcar, and similar programs. Washington, D.C., has just begun a conceptually similar bike&#45;sharing program.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:07:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Three Worlds</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/three_worlds/</link>
      <description>My column this week about navigating through big and complicated worlds prompted an interesting response from John Long, a reader who doesn&#8217;t share my political philosophy, but is a master of the sadly disappearing art of disagreeing agreeably ....</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long, who has a bit of the philosopher in him, wrote:</p>

<blockquote><p><b>Bob, if you were just another right-of-center columnist griping about liberals (which sometimes you are) I&#8217;d eventually stop reading. But by golly there is this transcendental streak in ya, that just keeps asserting itself. And I believe that tendency in you is the answer to the very questions you are posing. How do we deal with these differing realities that constantly lay siege to our consciousness and still keep our sanity? Well, I think we have to acknowledge, examine, and reflect upon them, just as you are doing. Too many people try to ignore both the inner and the outer worlds, preferring to live in some kind of non-thinking trance built upon and limited to television, sports, physical pleasures, mindless hobbies, or money-making. Others may turn to religion, but in such a dogmatic way that it becomes a security blanket instead of a genuine seeking after God. I like your columns when you get off the bus and look up at the stars.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t claim to have an answer to your question, and besides, the question and the answer are somewhat different for each individual. But I do have an opinion about that third world, or as you call it &#8220;wide world&#8221; that &#8220;assaults&#8221; us through the media (of which your newspaper is one example). There is no doubt that we have an immeasurably larger access to information now than, say, our grandparents had. We have seen that access grow through radio, newspapers, magazines, books, and television over recent generations. And now we have the internet, which is still developing but which takes access to a level even we ourselves could not have imagined 20 years ago. Not only can we access information, we can generate and contribute to and exchange information, thoughts, and opinions, as you and I are doing right now through this blog. Yes, sometimes it very painful to be made aware of all the horrible things going on in the world. But perhaps that is the necessary fire we have to walk through in order, eventually, to rid the world of those things. I believe the upside of our evolving level of communication is that it is forcing us all to think globally. We are on a path toward freely communicating globally, without borders, limits, or the strictures of politics, nationalism, or dogma. I like to think it is a great big step in our evolution toward becoming something better than we are. </p>

<p><br />
</b></p></blockquote>

<p>Thanks, John, for the interesting response&#8212;and for changing the subject from right/left political squabbles.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:26:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Winning in Iraq</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/winning_in_iraq/</link>
      <description>In today&#8217;s Wall Street Journal, Bing West, a former assistant secretary of defense who served in the Marine Corps, says the war in Iraq has ended:

The war I witnessed for more than five years in Iraq is over. In July, there were five American fatalities in Iraq, the lowest since the war began in March 2003. In Mosul recently, I chatted with shopkeepers on the same corner where last January a Humvee was blown apart in front of me. In the Baghdad district of Ghazilia&#8212;where last January snipers controlled streets awash in human waste&#8212;I saw clean streets and soccer games. In Basra, the local British colonel was dining at a restaurant in the center of the bustling city.

For the first time in 15 trips across the country, I didn&#8217;t hear one shot or a single blast from a roadside bomb. In Anbar Province, scene of the fiercest fighting during the war, the tribal sheiks insisted to Barack Obama on his recent visit that the U.S. Marines had to stay because they were the most trusted force.

The war turned around in late 2006 because American troops partnered with Iraqi forces and tribal auxiliaries to protect the population. Feeling safe, the population informed on the militias and terrorists living among them. Then, in the spring of 2008, Prime Minister Nouri al&#45;Maliki attacked the Mahdi militia of radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al&#45;Sadr that controlled Basra and half of Baghdad. The militia crumbled under pressure from Iraqi soldiers backed by coalition intelligence and air assets.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:03:01 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>What They Said</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/what_they_said/</link>
      <description>On Sunday, we made our case for drilling offshore and in ANWR.

Now The Washington Post has its own take on the issue: 

. . .&amp;nbsp; there are three &#8220;truths&#8221; masquerading as fact among drilling opponents that need to be challenged:


&#183; Drilling is pointless because the United States has only 3 percent of the world&#8217;s oil reserves. This is a misleading because it refers only to known oil reserves. According to the Interior Department&#8217;s Minerals Management Service (MMS), while there are an estimated 18 billion barrels of oil in the off&#45;limits portions of the OCS, those estimates were made using old data from now&#45;outdated seismic equipment. In the case of the Atlantic Ocean, the data were collected before Congress imposed a moratorium on offshore drilling in 1981. In 1987, the MMS estimated that there were 9 billion barrels of oil in the Gulf of Mexico. By 2006, after major advances in seismic technology and deepwater drilling techniques, the MMS resource estimate for that area had ballooned to 45 billion barrels. In short, there could be much more oil under the sea than previously known. The demand for energy is going up, not down. And for a long time, even as alternative sources of energy are developed, more oil will be needed. . . .

Read the whole thing.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Road Woes</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/road_woes/</link>
      <description>A review of a new book on the history of traffic suggests just how intractable the problem is&#8212;and how devilishly hard it might be to solve. Some juicy bits:

Traffic does not yield to simple, appealing solutions. Adding lanes or roads is a short&#45;lived fix. Widen one highway, and drivers from another will defect. Soon that road is worse than it was before. The most effective, least popular solution &#8212; aside from the currently effective, unpopular solution of $5&#45;a&#45;gallon gasoline &#8212; is congestion pricing: charging extra to use roads during rush hours. For unknown reasons, Americans will accept a surcharge for peak&#45;travel&#45;time hotel rooms and airfares but not for roads. 

If it&#8217;s any consolation, traffic has always been bad. . . . [I]n ancient Rome, &#8220;the chariot traffic grew so intense that Caesar ... declared a daytime ban on carts and chariots, &#8216;except to transport construction materials for the temples of the gods or for other great public works or to take away demolition materials.&#8217;&#8221;

[snip]

Vanderbilt spends much time deconstructing crashes &#8212; a problem even before there were cars. &#8220;In the New York of 1867,&#8221; he writes, &#8220;horses were killing an average of four pedestrians a week (a bit higher than today&#8217;s rate of traffic fatalities).&#8221;

[snip]

This basic truth &#8212; feeling safe kills &#8212; lies beneath many of the book&#8217;s insights. Americans think roundabouts are more dangerous than intersections with traffic lights. 

[snip]

For similar reasons, S.U.V.&#8217;s are more dangerous than cars. Not just because they&#8217;re slower to stop and harder to maneuver, but because &#8212; by conferring a sense of safety &#8212; they invite careless behavior. &#8220;The safer cars get,&#8221; Vanderbilt says, &#8220;the more risks drivers choose to take.&#8221; . . . So it goes for much of the driving universe. More people are killed while crossing in crosswalks than while jaywalking. Drivers pass bicyclists more closely on a road with bike lanes than on one without.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Fun Read of the Day</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/fun_read_of_the_day/</link>
      <description>On simplexity:

Of all the people blamed for the Iraq war and the failures of the Bush administration, the name of Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig rarely comes up. But maybe it should. Selig has held his job since 1992, but for several years he was technically the acting commissioner, a team owner merely caretaking the job while searching for a permanent replacement. George W. Bush, then part&#45;owner of the Texas Rangers, was candid about his interest in the position. Selig dithered, Bush gave up and soon decided that politics might be a good alternative career.

Again and again, American history has turned on the dime of such tiny things.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:27:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Ask The Experts</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/ask_the_experts/</link>
      <description>George Mason University Professor Stephen Farnsworth wrote a terrific column in yesterday&#8217;s Commentary section  analyzing Tim Kaine&#8217;s worthiness for the Democratic vice presidential nomination. But what about Virginia&#8217;s other possible resident of Number One Observatory Circle?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was Farnsworth&#8217;s take on the growing Eric Cantor for VP speculation: &#8220;Cantor would surprise me more than Kaine, as it reduces the ability of McCain to talk about his rival&#8217;s relative inexperience.&#8220; </p>

<p>In the same way an Obama pick of ... say ... Joe Biden might belie the Illinois senator&#8217;s message of completely changing the way Washington works (Biden has been a U.S. senator for more than half his life) Cantor might undermine the narrative McCain is trying to write about experience and readiness. McCain would be the oldest president in the history of the Republic. Evaluating the readiness of the Arizona senator&#8217;s vice presidential choice will be the most relevant second-in-command analysis of any candidate in decades. 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:05:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>More Virginia Veeps</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/more_virginia_veeps/</link>
      <description>Intrade, the respected futures market for political and economic predictions, is showing a strong lean to Virginians in the veepstakes. On the GOP side, Rep. Eric Cantor has jumped to third place behind Mitt Romney and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty. Among the Dems, Gov. Tim Kaine is running second behind Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh.

Cantor&#8217;s name was first mentioned in the Editorial Pages of this newspaper, by the way.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>But Wait ... There&#8217;s More</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/but_wait_theres_more/</link>
      <description>Virginia has voted Republican in every presidential election since supporting Richard Nixon&#8217;s 1968 campaign. But the streak actually is more impressive than that ...</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King Charles II&#8217;s Old Dominion has voted Republican in every election since 1952, save one&#8212;and Lyndon Johnson had to convince voters Barry Goldwater desperately wanted to start a nuclear war to win the commonwealth&#8217;s 1964 electoral votes. </p>

<p>That&#8217;s the tide Barack Obama swims against as he tries to end a nearly six-decade long Virginia tradition of going into the voting booth and pulling the GOP presidential lever. </p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Barack Obama Is Ticked Off That You&#8217;re Getting Rich</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/barack_obama_is_ticked_off_that_youre_getting_rich/</link>
      <description>According to his campaign, Barack Obama says:

Perhaps the only thing more outrageous than Exxon Mobil making record profits while Americans are paying record prices at the pump is the fact that Senator McCain has proposed giving them an additional $1.2 billion tax break. . . . It&#8217;s time to create a new American energy economy by investing in alternative energy, creating millions of new jobs, increasing fuel efficiency standards, and ending the tyranny of oil once and for all.

And according to &#8220;Marketplace Morning Report&#8221;:

Don&#8217;t consider yourself an energy tycoon? Well, you might be a fat cat and not even know it. Mutual fund company Vanguard, for instance, has billions of dollars in ExxonMobil stock. Most of that is owned by investors in two Vanguard index funds.

Morningstar analyst Michael Herbst:

Millions of investors do own some of these stocks, and those investors are likely some of the same people who are cringing every time they go to the gas tank these days.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Kaine = Quayle?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/kaine_quayle/</link>
      <description>National Review has a hit piece on Virginia&#8217;s governor that calls him &#8220;Obama&#8217;s Qualye&#8221;:

Obama and Kaine would be the most inexperienced pair to hit Washington in modern history. Then&#45;one&#45;term&#45;governor Jimmy Carter at least had Walter Mondale, who had been a senator for 12 years. Bill Clinton and Al Gore look like seasoned old pros by comparison. 

Given NR&#8217;s partisan tendencies, Obama could pick Newt Gingrich as a running&#45;mate, and the magazine would still slam the Democrat for picking a wild&#45;eyed liberal.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Get Out of Her Way</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/get_out_of_her_way/</link>
      <description>Hubris, n. (&lt; Gk h&#253;bris, insolence): See: Pelosi, Nancy.

&quot;I&#39;m trying to save the planet,&quot; says the Speaker of the House. 

If you&#8217;re trying to save the planet, then the people who are trying to stop you are, ipso facto, trying to destroy the planet, no?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Mandate Mitt&#8217;s Massachusetts Muddle</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/mandate_mitts_massachusetts_muddle/</link>
      <description>&#8220;I like mandates,&#8220; former GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney has said. Most politicians do. With the stroke of a pen, mandates seemingly give government the ability to reorder the universe.

But reality has a way of rearing its ugly head. Example: In Massachusetts, the costs of Romneycare&#8217;s publicly subsidized health insurance are exploding.

Anybody surprised?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>What do you really think?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/what_do_you_really_think/</link>
      <description>Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center has never been one to pull punches. For example: 

&#8220;To say that Sen. Obama is driving the narrative is disingenuous.&amp;nbsp; He is but a passenger aboard the Obama Paparazzi Express.&amp;nbsp;   

 

&#8220;The liberal media are so infatuated that it has caused them to become totally disconnected from reality.&amp;nbsp; They are obsessed with Sen. Obama.&amp;nbsp; Day after day and night after night they deliver endless streams of nauseatingly positive stories.&amp;nbsp; They gallivant around the globe in lusty pursuit to continue uninterrupted their on&#45;air fawning.&amp;nbsp; And then they pause to wonder why his opponent can&#8217;t make news.&#8221;</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Fixing Housing (Programs)</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/fixing_housing_programs/</link>
      <description>Today&#8217;s best read may be Sudhir Venkatesh&#8217;s piece in The New York Times on federal housing policy:

Since its inception, HUD has had a fairly straightforward recipe: develop good relations with mayors and local real estate leaders, then award grants and underwrite loans that affirm local development priorities. The longtime mayor of Chicago, Richard J. Daley, was often credited for creating the &#8220;city that works,&#8221; but it was the support of HUD and the housing administration that helped him eradicate slums, build public housing and create the vast array of working&#45;class neighborhoods that are now Chicago&#8217;s signature. 

But in the last four decades the urban landscape has changed from discrete, independent cities to vast, interdependent regions where people and goods move freely. Between Los Angeles and Orange County, Milwaukee and Chicago, Boston and Philadelphia, cities have no choice but to collaborate on decisions over land use and economic development. In taxation and zoning, regional agencies like the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority are as powerful as big&#45;city mayors. And for the first time in our nation&#8217;s history, poverty is rising faster in suburbs than in urban cores. In this new era, HUD&#8217;s each&#45;city&#45;is&#45;a&#45;separate&#45;whole approach is not only too inflexible and short&#45;sighted, it also hinders effective regional growth.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Glorious France?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/glorious_france/</link>
      <description>American media outlets are fond of pointing out how ever so much smarter the French are because they mandate lengthy vacations and an easy work schedule.

Not so fast: France is scrapping the mandatory&#45;maximum 35&#45;hour week.

Time to shift the focus to Sweden!</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Serious Questions for Mr. O</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/serious_questions_for_mr_o/</link>
      <description>Thomas Sowell offers some queries that reporters who are getting tired of lobbing softballs might want to ask the Democratic contender. Examples: 

Q: You said you would sit down, without preconditions, with leaders like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran and Kim Jong Il of North Korea. You later agreed to hold such talks only under prearranged conditions. You further stated that such talks would occur only when and if you choose to hold them. Again, please clarify.

Q: You point to Kennedy&#8217;s 1961 summit with Khrushchev, held without preconditions. But Kennedy&#8217;s secretary of state, Dean Rusk, advised against the meeting, and Kennedy later declared the talks a disaster. Many historians say that Khrushchev sized up Kennedy as a novice, which em&#45;boldened Khrushchev in building the Berlin Wall and in putting missiles in Cuba. Is it wise to hold up the Kennedy/Khrushchev summit as a model?</description>
      <dc:subject>Domestic</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Is the Bush Administration Soft on Criminals?</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/is_the_bush_administration_soft_on_criminals/</link>
      <description>If the criminals are businesses that hire illegal aliens, then some say yes&#8212;but perhaps not so much now as it has been.</description>
      <dc:subject>Domestic</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>Choices</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/choices/</link>
      <description>Is the GOP secretly working to elect Barack Obama? Let&#8217;s think about the evening of Sept. 4, 2008 . . .</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the evening of Sept. 4, 2008 Americans will have the choice of watching:<br />
 
(a) The New York Giants and the Washington Redskins kickoff the 2008 NFL season<br />
 
or<br />
 
(b) John McCain accept the Republican nomination for president. <br />
 
I can&#8217;t decide whether to refrain from using the word &#8220;idiotic&#8221; to describe that scheduling. Obviously most Americans will choose (b). NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell&#8212;son of a former Republican senator from New York&#8212;must be working feverishly to reschedule.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>




    <item>
      <title>More Depressing Poll Numbers ...</title>
      <link>http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/index.php/boardroom/more_depressing_poll_numbers/</link>
      <description>... for the news media. A Rasmussen Reports national survey shows that 49 percent of Americans expect the news media to help Barack Obama ...</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... while only 14 percent believe the media will help John McCain. Worst number of all: just 24 percent say the media will play it straight.</p>

<p>Separate Rasmussen surveys give the media low marks for credibility on the coverage of the economy and the war in Iraq. No wonder so many papers are turning their attention to local news these days, where good reporters can write accurate stories without relying on wire reports.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:33:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>